RSS Feeds Feeds: Articles | Issues
Articles About TAP Subscribe Donate
TAPPED  |  Beat the Press

Remember Me
Forgot your password?

The symbol identifies content for paid subscribers only.


 



The group blog of The American Prospect

Carville And King's Silence.

This slipped my mind yesterday, but Mary Matalin made an outrageous statement on John King's CNN show on Sunday, referring to President Obama (transcript via Nexis):

So he can be rational, particularly since he knows these clods and demagogues in his party use references to him, from Jimmy Carter to Nancy Pelosi -- they're clever and come out and play the race card. And the -- and the Obama people themselves played the race card against, of all people, Bill Clinton -- yes, they did -- who is -- arguably had a more authentic black American experience than Barack Obama. But the Democratic Party has a long history of playing all the hate cards. If you're pro-marriage, you hate gays. If you're pro- life, you hate women. If you're pro-freedom, you hate government.

I'm curious--was it Matlin's work for Dick Cheney or George Allen that made her such an expert on blackness? Oh I know--it was being chief of staff to Lee Atwater. That must have been it. How exactly is Obama's experience not "authentically black"? What exactly makes Bill Clinton's experience more "authentically black" than Barack Obama's? Maybe she's riffing off Andy Young or Shelby Steele. Who knows. But the next time Matalin appears on CNN, she should be asked to explain what she meant.

In a debate about whether or not race is playing a part in the health care debate, Matlin made an indefensible and racially charged comment--one that at the very least, begged an explanation--and neither John King nor James Carville actually had a word to say about it. Matalin felt comfortable making such a statement on television, and with good reason! Neither of the other two people on the show felt there was anything wrong with it, or tried to correct her or ask what she could possibly mean. Imagine what she says in private.

Matalin made a ridiculous statement--and no one batted an eye. But it's almost understandable--had someone said something, they would have been accused of "playing the race card" because for some people, racism doesn't make them uncomfortable. Calling it what it is makes them uncomfortable. So neither of Matalin's colleagues said a word.

-- A. Serwer


COMMENTS

Typical Republican and Southern Crap. Its just like pornography, you know what it is when you see it and in the vast majority of American life, Racism is Alive and Well, just hidden under the covers.

Republicans are the Party of Hate and they do Hate America for not electing them.

Am I misremembering or aren't Carville and Matalin married? I've never liked when they're on the same shows at once.

Demagogues? Like, you know, beck and Limbaugh? Why are highly respected Dems demagogues, and those who really demagogue immune from being called out?

That Obama played the race card against Clinton = true.

What's the alleged "outrageous" statement?

That Obama played the race card against Clinton = true.

What's the alleged "outrageous" statement?

Posted by: Anonymous | September 22, 2009 1:45 PM

No one needed Obama to figure out that the Clintons were cynically exploiting race.

To Daniel - Yes, Carville and Matalin are married, so of course he didn't call her out on that...

No one needed Micheline to figure out that Obama was cynically exploiting race

Fixed.

To Laura - I hope you didn't take that as me downplaying what happened. My post was more of an "in addition" detailing what should be an obvious conflict of interest, but I've long given up on cable news doing anything more than WWE-style "entertaining."

seLamun aLeykum nasIlsınız BakaLım

What's most interesting to me is that no one, NO ONE, in the MSM (not the designated "libruls" like Carville (her already implicated husband) or any other others) dare to call out cardboard "announcers" like John King on their indebtedness (for their positions) to the rightwing, evidenced by their not questioning obvious untruths from the wingnuts like Matalin - as you mentioned - whom it should only be rightly introduced before she speaks every time that she was Atwater's Chief of Staff as well as Bush's, et al.

I'm curious--was it Matlin's work for Dick Cheney or George Allen that made her such an expert on blackness? Oh I know--it was being chief of staff to Lee Atwater.

Post a comment


Search TAPPED for:

Archives

About TAPPED

TAPPED, the Prospect's award-winning group blog, is a link-intensive collection of musings, ramblings, opinions and other assorted writing on the political developments of the day. See a list of our contributors.

| RSS | Twitter


Renew your print subscription or e-subscription.
Get an e-subscription for $14.95.
Give the gift of political insight. Send The American Prospect to a friend.
Change your email address or street address.
YES! I want to receive The American Prospect
— the essential source for progressive ideas.
Explore The American Prospect's award-winning investigative journalism and provocative essays in a free trial issue. Continue receiving The American Prospect at only $19.95 for a one-year subscription - a savings of 60% off the newsstand price!
First Name
Last Name
Address 1
Address 2
City
State
ZIP     
Email

Should you decide not to continue receiving the magazine after the initial free issue, simply write "cancel" on the invoice and you will not be billed.

© 2010 by The American Prospect, Inc.  |  Privacy Policy  |  Permissions and Reprints