RSS Feeds Feeds: Articles | Issues
Articles About TAP Subscribe Donate
TAPPED  |  Beat the Press

Remember Me
Forgot your password?

The symbol identifies content for paid subscribers only.


 



The group blog of The American Prospect

Lightning Round: Ronaldus Magnus.

  • No one wants to talk about the fact that sooner or later the federal government will have to increase revenues to close the budget deficit, because American politicians are no longer allowed to mention the word "tax" unless it's succeeded by the word "cuts." Of course, one source of revenue that shouldn't be controversial, corporate taxes, could supply some of that revenue, so it's discouraging to see that option is off the table because of "complaints from businesses."
  • Sen. Ben Nelson (D-NE) doesn't know if he can support a health-care reform bill without support from Olympia Snowe, adding that it's a "good question." Here's an even better question: why does it matter for your vote how Snowe votes? Or here's another one: what do you believe a good reform bill looks like? I doubt Nelson could answer these questions honestly because he doesn't seem to have any principles whatsoever.
  • If you're National Review and you're looking for a voice to pen a column on the "fiasco" of Obama's handling of health-care reform, you have endless talent to choose from. But you also want credibility. So who do you turn to? Why, a convicted criminal businessman currently serving time for fraud, of course! Fortunately, the editorial standards are higher at The Corner, where Andy McCarthy can compare Rush Limbaugh to Martin Luther King Jr., secure in the knowledge that the blog's editors will have his back.
  • Remainders: Clearly the National Football League suffers from an extraordinary amount of liberal bias; AP "news analysis" asks whether Obama is "obnoxiously articulate" now, not articulate enough one month ago; and Republicans are correct that treating politicians like saints is ridiculous.

--Mori Dinauer



COMMENTS

If a corporation is a separate "person" for 1st Amendment purposes then it should be separate person for income tax purposes and pay taxes on its income (not net income) at the individual income tax rates !

Post a comment


Search TAPPED for:

Archives

About TAPPED

TAPPED, the Prospect's award-winning group blog, is a link-intensive collection of musings, ramblings, opinions and other assorted writing on the political developments of the day. See a list of our contributors.

| RSS | Twitter


Renew your print subscription or e-subscription.
Get an e-subscription for $14.95.
Give the gift of political insight. Send The American Prospect to a friend.
Change your email address or street address.
YES! I want to receive The American Prospect
— the essential source for progressive ideas.
Explore The American Prospect's award-winning investigative journalism and provocative essays in a free trial issue. Continue receiving The American Prospect at only $19.95 for a one-year subscription - a savings of 60% off the newsstand price!
First Name
Last Name
Address 1
Address 2
City
State
ZIP     
Email

Should you decide not to continue receiving the magazine after the initial free issue, simply write "cancel" on the invoice and you will not be billed.

© 2010 by The American Prospect, Inc.  |  Privacy Policy  |  Permissions and Reprints