RSS Feeds Feeds: Articles | Issues
Articles About TAP Subscribe Donate
TAPPED  |  Beat the Press

Remember Me
Forgot your password?

The symbol identifies content for paid subscribers only.


 



The group blog of The American Prospect

Republicans Give the Game Away on Stimulus.

stimuluslogo.jpgTypically, whenever you see a project funded by the stimulus, there is a sign near by pointing out that it was funded by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. It lets the public know what they're getting for their money. It turns out the signs are pretty expensive -- weird, right? can't they just get cheaper signs? -- and that some states are forgoing that expenditure to put their stimulus money toward something more tangible. Which is fine, except now Republicans are making political hay out of the issue.
“We think the signs promote transparency and accountability — so taxpayers can know where their money is being spent and on what,” said Jill Zuckman, the Department of Transportation’s director for public affairs. “But the important thing is that the projects be sound, well run and job creating.”

The sign question has taken on partisan overtones. Some Republicans say the signs are essentially publicly financed advertisements for one of the Obama administration’s signature programs.

“These signs are simply for political self-interest, and it’s high time we stop using stimulus dollars to fund them, and instead use these dollars for their intended purpose of creating economic activity,” Senator Judd Gregg of New Hampshire, a Republican who voted against the stimulus package, said in a statement last month. He tried — and failed — to prohibit the use of the signs.

Gregg's argument about political self-interest is revealing: It wouldn't be in the Democrats' interest to have the signs up unless the projects supported by the stimulus are popular, but Republicans aren't supposed to admit that stimulus projects are something the public might like. In fact, I buy Zuckman's argument: this is about accountability. People should know what stimulus dollars are doing, and judge the project on that basis. If they see the projects as a waste, they should know that, too. The GOP would rather hide what's happening on the ground so they can continue to rail against something that most people think is popular (similar to their new found love of Medicare and hatred of government health-care programs).

But, jeez, let's just get some cheaper signs.

-- Tim Fernholz



COMMENTS

Money being spent on signs is providing jobs for signmakers!!! Do these people not understand the meaning of stimulus?

That's just politics 101 -- every local, state, or federal officeholder wants to take credit for visible government spending. It's a 'dog bites man' story.

Post a comment


Search TAPPED for:

Archives

About TAPPED

TAPPED, the Prospect's award-winning group blog, is a link-intensive collection of musings, ramblings, opinions and other assorted writing on the political developments of the day. See a list of our contributors.

| RSS | Twitter


Renew your print subscription or e-subscription.
Get an e-subscription for $14.95.
Give the gift of political insight. Send The American Prospect to a friend.
Change your email address or street address.
YES! I want to receive The American Prospect
— the essential source for progressive ideas.
Explore The American Prospect's award-winning investigative journalism and provocative essays in a free trial issue. Continue receiving The American Prospect at only $19.95 for a one-year subscription - a savings of 60% off the newsstand price!
First Name
Last Name
Address 1
Address 2
City
State
ZIP     
Email

Should you decide not to continue receiving the magazine after the initial free issue, simply write "cancel" on the invoice and you will not be billed.

© 2010 by The American Prospect, Inc.  |  Privacy Policy  |  Permissions and Reprints