RSS Feeds Feeds: Articles | Issues
Articles About TAP Subscribe Donate
TAPPED  |  Beat the Press

Remember Me
Forgot your password?

The symbol identifies content for paid subscribers only.


 



The group blog of The American Prospect

Uigurs Will Get Their Day In Court.

The Supreme Court has agreed to take up the case of several Chinese Uighurs still being held at Guantanamo Bay prison despite the fact that they were determined not to be enemy combatants. The Uighurs, members of an embattled Chinese Muslim ethnic minority, have not been released to China because of fear that they might be abused -- but a DC circuit court decision last February also determined that U.S. courts had no authority to order their release into the United States. The Supreme Court will be reconsidering the lower court's decision, which civil libertarians contend unfairly curtails the habeas rights of detainees.

Jonathan Hafetz, a lawyer for the ACLU's National Security Project, which filed an amicus brief in favor of the SCOTUS hearing the case, praised the court's decision. “If a court rules that a detention is illegal but cannot issue a remedy by directing a detainees release," Hafetz says, "then habeas is essentially a dead letter, and the courts are powerless to correct lawless executive action.” He added that the lower court's decision was a "direct assault" on the Supreme Court's decision in the Bourmediene v. Bush case that granted habeas rights to prisoners at Guantanamo Bay.

Part of the administration's apprehension about releasing the Uighurs into the United States is that Republicans, including Newt Gingrich, sought to portray them as dangerous terrorists who were a security risk. In an op-ed for the Washington Examiner, Gingrich called them "trained mass killers instructed by the same terrorists responsible for killing 3,000 Americans on September 11, 2001." Gingrich also linked the Uighurs to the Eastern Turkistan Islamic Movement, an Al Qaeda affiliated terrorist group the detained Uighurs said they've never heard of.

The Uighurs seemed puzzled -- at the time they responded through a translator, asking, "Why does he hate us so much and say those kinds of things?"

Earlier this year, the U.S. transferred four Uighurs to Bermuda, and arranged for the transfer of several others to Palau.

-- A. Serwer



COMMENTS

Actually Adam, it's not just the fear of republicans. Last I checked, it was law. Congress got scared and prevented the administration from transferring any detainees to American soil.

Post a comment


Search TAPPED for:

Archives

About TAPPED

TAPPED, the Prospect's award-winning group blog, is a link-intensive collection of musings, ramblings, opinions and other assorted writing on the political developments of the day. See a list of our contributors.

| RSS | Twitter


Renew your print subscription or e-subscription.
Get an e-subscription for $14.95.
Give the gift of political insight. Send The American Prospect to a friend.
Change your email address or street address.
YES! I want to receive The American Prospect
— the essential source for progressive ideas.
Explore The American Prospect's award-winning investigative journalism and provocative essays in a free trial issue. Continue receiving The American Prospect at only $19.95 for a one-year subscription - a savings of 60% off the newsstand price!
First Name
Last Name
Address 1
Address 2
City
State
ZIP     
Email

Should you decide not to continue receiving the magazine after the initial free issue, simply write "cancel" on the invoice and you will not be billed.

© 2009 by The American Prospect, Inc.  |  Privacy Policy  |  Permissions and Reprints