RSS Feeds Feeds: Articles | Issues
Articles About TAP Subscribe Donate
TAPPED  |  Beat the Press

Remember Me
Forgot your password?

The symbol identifies content for paid subscribers only.


 



The group blog of The American Prospect

CLIMATE CHANGE BILL UPDATE.

Yesterday afternoon, John Kerry held a conference call with bloggers that covered a range of topics, from international accords to probably the hottest domestic topic, the Lieberman-Warner bill, or "America's Climate Security Act." On Thursday, the bill made it through its first (and fairly contentious) mark-up hearing. The disagreement between Dems is over whether the bill is tough enough; it aims for 63 percent emissions cuts by 2050, while others (and science) says we need 80 percent. And with Republicans, well, it's still a question of whether most of them will support any targets for emissions cuts.

Kerry seemed to think that worries about passing weaker legislation now and getting stuck with it are unfounded. We can pass a plan now and strengthen it later, he says, as support for action on climate change grows among citizens and businessfolk:

Everything along the way on this issue has been a question of moving mountains. People keep saying you're never going to get one out, you're never going to get Republicans on board. Every step of the way, we've been able to confound that, and grow the consensus, and bring new players to the table […] As you see the science come in month to month, week to week, all of it more dire and more compelling than month and weeks before, we're reaching more people. We've got to just keep pounding away and change it […] There are any number of bills that pass through here that we revisit, and improve and make better later on.

For more on this, Brian Beutler's been covering the hearings on it over on Gristmill. The question of how much to push for right now is a big one; do you hold out for a better deal, or push through one that stands a better chance of passing?

--Kate Sheppard



COMMENTS

Just out of curiosity, can somebody provide examples of bills--legislation, yaknow?-- which were regarded as flawed by weakness at passage, and which were subsequently STRENGTHENED in the public interest later at the expense of the interests which assured their weakness in the first place?

That's a good question. I will look into it.

Post a comment


Search TAPPED for:

Archives

About TAPPED

TAPPED, the Prospect's award-winning group blog, is a link-intensive collection of musings, ramblings, opinions and other assorted writing on the political developments of the day. See a list of our contributors.

| RSS | Twitter


Renew your print subscription or e-subscription.
Get an e-subscription for $14.95.
Give the gift of political insight. Send The American Prospect to a friend.
Change your email address or street address.
YES! I want to receive The American Prospect
— the essential source for progressive ideas.
Explore The American Prospect's award-winning investigative journalism and provocative essays in a free trial issue. Continue receiving The American Prospect at only $19.95 for a one-year subscription - a savings of 60% off the newsstand price!
First Name
Last Name
Address 1
Address 2
City
State
ZIP     
Email

Should you decide not to continue receiving the magazine after the initial free issue, simply write "cancel" on the invoice and you will not be billed.

© 2009 by The American Prospect, Inc.  |  Privacy Policy  |  Permissions and Reprints