SLOW DOWN THERE, COWBOYS.
Neocon Fred Kagan and "Brookings Institution liberal" Michael O'Hanlon (author of the infamous "Skeptic's Case for the Surge") took to the New York Times yesterday to caution, "We need to think -- now -- about our feasible military options in Pakistan, should it really come to that."
Because any credible attempt to stabilize a collapsed Pakistan would take at least half a million troops, Kagan and O'Hanlon float the idea of sending American Special Ops forces to the country now -- diplomacy, shmiplomacy -- to secure nuclear weapons and prop up the Pakistani government. There's no mention of what or who that government would or should be, of course, or how the disgruntled Pakistani people would view such an intervention. Because what really matters is our "next big test" militarily -- nevermind learning the lessons of the exam we've already failed in Iraq.
--Dana Goldstein
Feeds: 



COMMENTS (4)
Hey, those guys have never been wrong before...
Posted by: Col Bat Guano | November 19, 2007 10:16 AM
Uncle Sam should let India take the lead on this one, letting the chips fall where they may....
Posted by: Anonymous | November 19, 2007 1:16 PM
Coming soon to a New York Times near you: "We need to think -- now -- about our feasible military options in Winnipeg, should it really come to that." Make it so, President Giuliani.
Posted by: Ripley | November 19, 2007 10:43 PM
Curious thing about that Kagan/O'Hanlon article:
if I read it correctly, it
mentioned India (and China)
exactly zero times ...
Posted by: ldb_in_CO | November 20, 2007 1:24 AM