ON VOTING.
In Washington, D.C, voting in national elections is essentially meaningless. We don't have a vote in the Senate and our symbolic House representative, Eleanor Holmes Norton, inevitably sails to victory. Our three electoral college votes are guaranteed to be Democratic. That's why it was all the more extraordinary that in my D.C. neighborhood of Mt. Pleasant this morning, best described as "a village in the city," I waited on a 1.5 hour line to vote at the local high school. First a two block outdoor line. Then a 10 minute wait to pass through a single metal detector, followed by a 20 minute line to enter the school's auditorium and then another 10 minute wait to check-in. Ballot in hand, I waited for a voting booth to free up, only to find there was a shortage of the required #2 pencils.
Did I finally vote? Yes. Afterward, on the bus to work, I heard a woman who lives a few blocks north of me, in a more affluent precinct, say her entire voting experience took five minutes. For me, voting was a deeply frustrating, discouraging experience. At several points, I came close to running out and hurrying to the office. "I'm late!" I kept thinking. I can only imagine how stressful it must have been for workers on a time-clock. As Adam and Ezra have written, there shouldn't be a "time tax" on voting.
But the hopeful thing was, nobody left. Everyone waited. The drive to participate in this year's election is so intense that people will spend 1.5 hours in line even in Washington, D.C., where the outcome is predetermined. I think that means voters in Ohio and Virginia and Colorado will be doubly committed, no matter what barriers they face.
--Dana Goldstein
Feeds: 





COMMENTS (6)
Good for you, glad you went the distance! In NYC, long lines everywhere, but people are hanging in there! As one who has voted for many decades and never faced a significant wait, this is absolutely thrilling to behold.
Posted by: lng | November 4, 2008 1:59 PM
Doesn't the person in charge of elections, or the person that person reports to, have to stand for election themselves? Why shouldn't their jobs be in jeopardy for poor performance? If I had to stand in line for 1 1/2 hours, somebody would have a challenger (and I would think, lots of donors) in the next election.
Don't put up with people trying to steal your vote, fight back!
Posted by: The Other Ed | November 4, 2008 2:16 PM
Afterward, on the bus to work, I heard a woman who lives a few blocks north of me, in a more affluent precinct, say her entire voting experience took five minutes.
I live in one of those more affluent districts and can attest to voting taking less than five minutes this morning at 8am. Driving down 16th I saw that line in the picture (I think) and wondered "who's in charge of allocating voting machines in this city."
Posted by: Ugh | November 4, 2008 3:03 PM
I have not voted yet but will be on my way soon, hopefully the line would have eased up. You are right Ugh. That is a good question. I never thought of it that way. Yes "who's in charge of allocating voting machines in this city?"
Posted by: arit | November 4, 2008 3:51 PM
I had the same experience this morning, having to wait for over 2 hours to vote in Brooklyn, NY. A deep blue county in a deep blue state, and yet, folks were truly excited about exercising their franchise. A remarkable thing.
Posted by: Passing Shot | November 4, 2008 4:28 PM
It was a two-hankie day in my Northeast DC neighborhood.
http://notionscapital.wordpress.com/2008/11/05/a-vote-for-change-at-precinct-86/
Posted by: Mike Licht | November 5, 2008 2:31 PM