RSS Feeds Feeds: Articles | Issues
Articles About TAP Subscribe Donate
TAPPED  |  Beat the Press

Remember Me
Forgot your password?

The symbol identifies content for paid subscribers only.


 



The group blog of The American Prospect

The FBI's "War Crimes" File.

According to the IG report I posted on earlier, FBI agents were occasionally told by detainees that they had been abused. There was no clear guidance on how to handle this information, but some agents were apparently told to keep the details for possible inclusion in a "war crimes" file:

FBI agents also reported to us that detainees sometimes told FBI agents they had previously been abused or mistreated. FBI practices in dealing with such allegations varied over time. Some agents were told to record such allegations for inclusion in a "war crimes" file; others were told to include the allegations in their regular FD-302 interview summaries. As noted above, other FBI agents told us they were instructed not to record such allegations at all. No formal FBI procedure for reporting incidents or allegations of mistreatment to the military was established until after the Abu Ghraib prison abuses became public in 2004.

If you're startled by the lack of euphemism in describing detainee treatment, you shouldn't be. According to the 2004 CIA IG report on "enhanced interrogation techniques," even CIA agents participating in harsh interrogations worried that what they were doing would someday result in them being prosecuted for war crimes. Keep in mind that a number of the interrogations where the FBI observed abuse appears to have involved military personnel -- which should remind us all of how narrow Eric Holder's torture probe -- which will focus solely on those CIA interrogators who may have gone beyond the "legally sanctioned" levels of torture authorized -- actually is.

Just reading through the report, I'm reminded of the impact the revelation of the Abu Ghraib scandal had on public opinion--and how that forced changes in policy. This becomes all the more significant when you consider that the president recently signed a bill that gives the secretary of defense the authority to exempt from the Freedom of Information Act photographs showing detainee abuse between 2001 and 2009.

-- A. Serwer



COMMENTS

Great topic, they are more attractive than others,


thank you for share, nike air max 90/95 on new models.

The information obtained from this very helpful for me, thank you.chi ceramic hair iron

Post a comment


Search TAPPED for:

Archives

About TAPPED

TAPPED, the Prospect's award-winning group blog, is a link-intensive collection of musings, ramblings, opinions and other assorted writing on the political developments of the day. See a list of our contributors.

| RSS | Twitter


Renew your print subscription or e-subscription.
Get an e-subscription for $14.95.
Give the gift of political insight. Send The American Prospect to a friend.
Change your email address or street address.
YES! I want to receive The American Prospect
— the essential source for progressive ideas.
Explore The American Prospect's award-winning investigative journalism and provocative essays in a free trial issue. Continue receiving The American Prospect at only $19.95 for a one-year subscription - a savings of 60% off the newsstand price!
First Name
Last Name
Address 1
Address 2
City
State
ZIP     
Email

Should you decide not to continue receiving the magazine after the initial free issue, simply write "cancel" on the invoice and you will not be billed.

© 2009 by The American Prospect, Inc.  |  Privacy Policy  |  Permissions and Reprints