RSS Feeds Feeds: Articles | Issues
Articles About TAP Subscribe Donate
TAPPED  |  Beat the Press

Remember Me
Forgot your password?

The symbol identifies content for paid subscribers only.


 



The group blog of The American Prospect

HOUSING MELTDOWN: REAL PEOPLE VERSION.

What did you and your family members talk about around the holiday table?

At my place, it was: “Hey, you’re an economist. I hear a lot about the housing bust, but how’s it playing out in the lives of real people?”

Real people? Not like “record high foreclosure rates”…“the loss of over $2 trillion in housing wealth”…“frozen credit markets”? Hmmm…I’m much better with spreadsheets.

It’s an important question, and thankfully, it was thoroughly answered by Peter Goodman in last Sunday’s New York Times.

Goodman reported on the impact of the bursting housing bubble in one of the most negatively effected communities in the country—Cape Coral, FL—so you could argue that the article gives the view from one unsettling end of a continuum. But this community is by no means alone, and I haven’t seen a better answer to the question posed by my brother-in-law.

I’ll summarize a few key findings, but the strength of the piece is its focus on the downstream impacts of the bust, specifically the way it’s rippling through the local economy, affecting everything from unemployment to crime.

Housing Market:

--about 5,000 homes are in foreclosure, four times higher than last year;

--the housing market is swamped with inventory; more than 19,000 homes/condos are listed, many of which are selling for less than the value of the owner’s mortgage debt (that’s important because you’ve got to convince the bank to take a hit, which slows down the inventory correction);

--home prices are down 14%, more than twice the national decline so far;

The Ripples:

--The city has eliminated 40 job slots related to the housing boom;

--County tax revenue is down 14%; plans for public school expansions are shelved due to both lack of resources and the fact that folks are leaving the area;

--Unemployment is up from about 3% to about 5%;

--A local car dealer reports the first significant sales drop in 25 years; a popular restaurant says business is off by a third;

--The empty homes are leading to sharp increases in crime rates; burglaries are up 35%; robberies, up 58%;

And then there are ripples that will emanate from these ripples. One local pointed to an “upside of the housing downturn:” it used to be tougher to hire people. He’s now getting 14 applicants for every job. Well, the downside to that upside is that wage offers will surely start to decline, as the supply of labor outpaces demand.

Another strange upside: the courts are so deep in foreclosure litigation that some families who know it’s coming are getting a respite: “We figure we have at least six months,” reported one resident. “We haven’t heard a thing from the bank for a long time.’”

Such reporting puts a human/community face on the macroeconomics of the housing meltdown. But it also provides some important insights in the way this is playing out.

First, while no region has escaped the spillovers from the bust, those markets that inflated the most are feeling the most pain. Second, this is a slow bleed. Foreclosures can take months, housing prices have actually been slow to correct (we’re talking big potential losses here, and neither owners nor banks want to cut prices unless they have to), meaning the inventory overhang will literally take years to work itself out. Third, the tax base of local communities is resetting significantly, as populations shift and taxes related to property and housing begin to tumble.

Many argue that such corrections may be painful, but they’re just the downside of the hill; the inevitable bust following the boom. You had your dessert first; now you’ve got to eat your spinach.

I don’t buy it for a second. Yes, as one real estate broker asserts in the piece, “Greed and speculation created the monster.” But we have institutions in this country—the Federal Reserve is the main one in this case—that are designed to push back against such human frailties. They’re supposed to watch for excesses exactly like those afoot in Cape Coral and turn up the regulation when necessary. In this case, that would have meant both tighter lending standards and national recognition of the housing bubble, warning people not to buy into it. Instead, lending standards were hugely relaxed and the Fed actively encouraged the use of “innovative” borrowing schemes.

One can only hope that we (re-)learn an important lesson: market ideology breeds market failures, and market failures hurt people…real people.

--Jared Bernstein



COMMENTS

This whole downturn completely baffles me. I bought a house five years ago. We had agents and brokers cooing over how much we-d been preapproved for -- wasn't that great! Well, it didn't mean much when we saw how much that meant in monthly payments. But we're very conservative, I'm a lawyer, and even with the fixed-rate, 30-year mortgage I wonder in what way we got screwed. It was liking being run over by a steam roller.

Meanwhile, we saw lots of people getting sucked into the ARMs and other crazy mortgages we knew they couldn't afford -- and often advised them against taking. Now they're losing their houses.

None of what's happening now should come as a surprise to anyone. It was foreseeable and it was preventable.

Yes the Fed is supposed to be looking for the common good. Even if they had would we have listened? When Mr. Greenspan talked of "irrational exuburance" did we listen? I didn't greed plugged my ears, and I lost a lot in my 401K. Even if Mr Bernanke had tried would he have been able to overcome the greed? This is a capitalist society, and capitalists believe Gordon Gecko when he said greed is good.

Post a comment


Search TAPPED for:

Archives

About TAPPED

TAPPED, the Prospect's award-winning group blog, is a link-intensive collection of musings, ramblings, opinions and other assorted writing on the political developments of the day. See a list of our contributors.

| RSS | Twitter


Renew your print subscription or e-subscription.
Get an e-subscription for $14.95.
Give the gift of political insight. Send The American Prospect to a friend.
Change your email address or street address.
YES! I want to receive The American Prospect
— the essential source for progressive ideas.
Explore The American Prospect's award-winning investigative journalism and provocative essays in a free trial issue. Continue receiving The American Prospect at only $19.95 for a one-year subscription - a savings of 60% off the newsstand price!
First Name
Last Name
Address 1
Address 2
City
State
ZIP     
Email

Should you decide not to continue receiving the magazine after the initial free issue, simply write "cancel" on the invoice and you will not be billed.

© 2009 by The American Prospect, Inc.  |  Privacy Policy  |  Permissions and Reprints