RSS Feeds Feeds: Articles | Issues
Articles About TAP Subscribe Donate
TAPPED  |  Beat the Press

Remember Me
Forgot your password?

The symbol identifies content for paid subscribers only.


 



The group blog of The American Prospect

OUR PLACE IN THE WORLD.

Via Mark Goldberg, the United Nations Development Program has released its annual Human Development Index rankings, and Iceland, Norway and Australia took the top three spots. The report ranks countries based on criteria like per capita GDP, life expectancy, per capita GDP, and the education level of its citizenry. The United States came in down in the 12 spot, under oft-hailed Sweden but two spots above similarly hailed Denmark.

Another interesting ranking out recently: the Humanitarian Response Index, put out by Dara International this week. This one ranked 22 developed nations on their response to humanitarian needs, integration of relief with development, willingness to work with NGOs, and cooperation with international law. The Nordic countries did well here too, with Sweden, Norway, and Denmark taking the top three spots, respectively. The United States is down at 16th, because though we give more in absolute terms, we're pretty stingy in relative terms. Foreign Policy provides some analysis:

The funny thing is, most Americans seem to think their country is opening the spigots when it comes to foreign aid. According to statistics compiled by Columbia University professor and FP contributor Jeffrey Sachs, the typical American believes that 25 percent of the gross national income (GNI) is spent on foreign aid. In actuality, the OECD reports that the U.S. provided just 0.22 percent of its GNI in direct foreign aid in 2005, or $27.6 billion.

If we were to give as much as our Nordic friends, which according to Sachs would provide the funds necessary to eliminate poverty in the world, we'd have to spend $93.8 billion each year in foreign aid. As FP points out, even if we added in the $33.6 billion Americans contribute through private organizations each year, we'd still be $32.6 billion short.

So not only are we pretty far down the rankings in development, we're also not doing much to help others on that front, either. We are, however, still leading the world in carbon emissions.

--Kate Sheppard

Post a comment


Search TAPPED for:

Archives

About TAPPED

TAPPED, the Prospect's award-winning group blog, is a link-intensive collection of musings, ramblings, opinions and other assorted writing on the political developments of the day. See a list of our contributors.

| RSS | Twitter


Renew your print subscription or e-subscription.
Get an e-subscription for $14.95.
Give the gift of political insight. Send The American Prospect to a friend.
Change your email address or street address.
YES! I want to receive The American Prospect
— the essential source for progressive ideas.
Explore The American Prospect's award-winning investigative journalism and provocative essays in a free trial issue. Continue receiving The American Prospect at only $19.95 for a one-year subscription - a savings of 60% off the newsstand price!
First Name
Last Name
Address 1
Address 2
City
State
ZIP     
Email

Should you decide not to continue receiving the magazine after the initial free issue, simply write "cancel" on the invoice and you will not be billed.

© 2010 by The American Prospect, Inc.  |  Privacy Policy  |  Permissions and Reprints