LIGHTNING ROUND: WE'RE ALL GEORGIANS NOW.
- Grist suggests a method by which Barack Obama could fast-track cap-and-trade legislation: "under the Clean Air Act, the EPA can also administer a national cap-and-trade program by writing federal rules to unify independent regional carbon markets. Already, 23 states and four Canadian provinces are forming such markets, with 10 additional states being brought into the process as observers. Experts believe the EPA can promulgate an additional set of regulations that would control transportation emissions -- everything from cars and trucks to boats and airplanes." Marc Ambinder notes that "Phil Schiliro, appointed to be Obama's legislative director and a long-time former chief of staff to Rep. Henry Waxman, fought for a full decade to put the Clean Air Act into law" but also reports that transition officials are divided as to whether utilizing the EPA to tackle climate change is actually under consideration.
- The New York Times reports that Barack Obama is looking for a capital city in the Muslim world to give a major foreign policy speech and concludes -- through process of elimination -- that Cairo is the best choice: "Still, Sameh Shoukry, the Egyptian ambassador, e-mailed me a statement. 'Needless to say, the President of the United States is always welcome in Egypt,' it said. 'Delivering such a speech from Cairo would no doubt reinforce the intended message. Cairo has long been a center of Islamic learning and scholarship, in line with Egypt’s central role in the Middle East.'"
- Current RNC Chair Mike Duncan believes Saxby Chambliss' victory in the Georgia runoff election not only refutes the "liberal mandate" of Barack Obama, but that "Georgians -- and all Americans -- will be watching Washington closely and expecting policies that make government work for them and not against small businesses and entrepreneurs." I never thought the phrase "we're all Georgians now" would have such a healthy -- and multipurpose -- shelf life.
- Grover Norquist sees opportunity in the great GOP shellacking of '08: "This is a tremendous opportunity to separate the sheep from the goats. The guys who turn around and say 'I can't rein in spending, I must raise taxes'...are going to have a hard time." Meanwhile, noted political mastermind Karl Rove suggests that Obama's win was mostly due to his formidable fundraising advantage: "Rather than showing the success of a new style of post-partisan politics, Mr. Obama's victory may show the enduring truth of the old Chicago Golden Rule: He who has the gold rules." Yeah, maybe. Or could it be that presidential elections are actually, you know, quite predictable?
- The Bushes are moving to Dallas after the president's term ends, to which Atrios gives the appropriate response: "Nobody could have predicted that the Crawford 'ranch' was just a campaign prop."
- The Linux geeks won't be happy about this: Bill Gates is open to playing a role in the Obama administration, although he is primarily committed to running his foundation. For what it's worth, I think Gates the philanthropist has largely compensated for the sins of Gates the software monopolist, but I'll let the comments thread have the final say on that one.
- The Chris Matthews Senate campaign story won't die, with Michael Calderone musing that Matthews' contract negotiations with MSNBC could mean he is prepping for a shift from political pundit to political candidate. A new Rasmussen poll puts Matthews just three points behind incumbent Arlen Specter in a theoretical head-to-head matchup.
- Steve Benen looks at the thawing of attitudes over the United States' decades-long -backward approach to Cuban foreign policy and concludes that the Obama administration could be in a unique position to lift the pointless embargoes that have done nothing to pressure Castro into changing the regime.
--Mori Dinauer
Feeds: 



COMMENTS (5)
The development of a mostly free and open internet, broadband, the rise of Google, and Web 2.0 have made Bill Gates as villain less relevant. It's like Dr. Evil being woken up from being frozen and asking for one million dollars or he'll blow up the world. Yeah, whatever.
Posted by: joejoejoe | December 4, 2008 10:58 PM
Re Gates: my understanding was the Microsoft was the largest donator to Bush's 2000 campaign. This was why as soon as Bush was elected the Justice Department called off the anti-trust case. The Foundation was part of the attempt to clean up his image from his ill gotten gains.
Let me reframe: Imagine a thief who stole from your bank account and gave it to a hospital charity, would where the money finished up excuse the previous crimes?
This tiger has never changed his spots and it would be a very dangerous to appoint him.
Posted by: Fozzy | December 4, 2008 11:30 PM
how you spend it can never make up for how you earned it even if you put a library in every town in Pennsylvania.
Posted by: wrong | December 5, 2008 7:44 AM
Although Chris Matthews has not confirmed it, he reportedly is planning to run for the Senate seat from Pennsylvania in 2010. He apparently has been meeting with Democratic leaders and is shopping for a house in his old home town, Philadelphia.
Matthews has been advised to resign soon from his position as host of MSNBC's popular Hardball program. This seems wise since the longer he stays there, the more likely he is of making a statement that could jeopardize his campaign. In fact, odds are high that, during a campaign, he will say something that could derail his election chances.
However, I hope that he runs and that he wins. One thing for sure, a debate moderator will not have a problem, as Jim Lehrer did, in getting Matthews to engage directly with his opponent. Note also that his likely opponent, Senator Arlen Spector, is no shrinking violet.
Then if he wins, it will be a treat seeing Matthews in the Senate, continually interrupting senior Senate leaders as they speak. The interruption may well be in the form of a long question that Matthews will then proceed to answer.
homer www.altara.blogspot.com
Posted by: altara | December 5, 2008 10:39 AM
"Rather than showing the success of a new style of post-partisan politics, Mr. Obama's victory may show the enduring truth of the old Chicago Golden Rule: He who has the gold rules."
In other news, those grapes were probably sour anyway.
Posted by: Chilly | December 5, 2008 10:42 AM