RSS Feeds Feeds: Articles | Issues
Articles About TAP Subscribe Donate
TAPPED  |  Beat the Press

Remember Me
Forgot your password?

The symbol identifies content for paid subscribers only.


 



The group blog of The American Prospect

OBAMA ON THE EFCA.

Yesterday, I wrote about how liberals would view the selection of labor activist Mary Beth Maxwell as a sign that Obama is serious about pushing the Employee Free Choice Act, or "card check." Dana believes that while that might be true, Maxwell might not be the most effective choice for Obama's "celebrity cabinet" where media savvy might end up being a more important asset for getting things done than other qualifications. But no matter who Obama ends up picking, he has said he will sign the EFCA:

An aide to Barack Obama reaffirmed the President-elect's support for the labor movement's chief legislative priority in a one-word statement issued to the Huffington Post on late Tuesday.

Asked if Obama's support for the Employee Free Choice Act remained as strong as his public proclamations suggested on the campaign trail, transition spokesman Dan Pfeiffer responded, succinctly, "Yes."

The reaffirmation may not seem like a political breakthrough on its surface. But in the current political climate, in which the Obama team has steadfastly refused to comment on various legislative priorities, it does signal that the President-elect is not shying away from progressive pledges made during his campaign.

This is probably reassuring to labor advocates, Rahm Emanuel's "throw long" appearance in front of business leaders nonwithstanding.

-- A. Serwer



COMMENTS

With all due respect, there's nothing "liberal" about unionism. Unionism limits individual liberty and thus is inherently opposed to liberalism in principle.

Unionism certainly is a core value of socialism and/or 'progressivism'.

Pretending that liberalism is the same as socialism or progressivism is normally a rightwing attack meme. Odd to see it coming so much from the left these days.

That being said, some liberals may favor unionism as public policy and some may oppose it. But insisting that unionism is liberalism just plain absurd.

Unionism may contribute to policy outcomes that liberals generally favor, but that doesn't mean liberals favor unions, qua unions.

Post a comment


Search TAPPED for:

Archives

About TAPPED

TAPPED, the Prospect's award-winning group blog, is a link-intensive collection of musings, ramblings, opinions and other assorted writing on the political developments of the day. See a list of our contributors.

| RSS | Twitter


Renew your print subscription or e-subscription.
Get an e-subscription for $14.95.
Give the gift of political insight. Send The American Prospect to a friend.
Change your email address or street address.
YES! I want to receive The American Prospect
— the essential source for progressive ideas.
Explore The American Prospect's award-winning investigative journalism and provocative essays in a free trial issue. Continue receiving The American Prospect at only $19.95 for a one-year subscription - a savings of 60% off the newsstand price!
First Name
Last Name
Address 1
Address 2
City
State
ZIP     
Email

Should you decide not to continue receiving the magazine after the initial free issue, simply write "cancel" on the invoice and you will not be billed.

© 2010 by The American Prospect, Inc.  |  Privacy Policy  |  Permissions and Reprints